From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:56:07 -0200
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:39:55PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Xin Long
>> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:07:38 +0800
>>
>> > Now sctp increases sk_wmem_alloc by 1 when doing set_owner_w for the
>> > skb allocked in sctp_p
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:39:55PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Xin Long
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:07:38 +0800
>
> > Now sctp increases sk_wmem_alloc by 1 when doing set_owner_w for the
> > skb allocked in sctp_packet_transmit and decreases by 1 when freeing
> > this skb.
> >
> > But whe
From: Xin Long
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:07:38 +0800
> Now sctp increases sk_wmem_alloc by 1 when doing set_owner_w for the
> skb allocked in sctp_packet_transmit and decreases by 1 when freeing
> this skb.
>
> But when this skb goes through networking stack, some subcomponents
> might change sk
Now sctp increases sk_wmem_alloc by 1 when doing set_owner_w for the
skb allocked in sctp_packet_transmit and decreases by 1 when freeing
this skb.
But when this skb goes through networking stack, some subcomponents
might change skb->truesize and add the same amount on sk_wmem_alloc.
However sctp
