On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:04:46PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The comment near __ptr_ring_peek says:
>
> * If ring is never resized, and if the pointer is merely
> * tested, there's no need to take the lock - see e.g. __ptr_ring_empty.
>
> but this was in fact never possible as index g
The comment near __ptr_ring_peek says:
* If ring is never resized, and if the pointer is merely
* tested, there's no need to take the lock - see e.g. __ptr_ring_empty.
but this was in fact never possible as index gets out of range
temporarily.
We tried to allocate one more entry for lockless
