On 07/14/2017 11:42 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
On 14 July 2017 at 09:10, Greg Rose wrote:
> When there is an established connection in direction A->B, it is
> possible to receive a packet on port B which then executes
> ct(commit,force) without first performing ct() - ie, a lookup.
> In this case,
On 14 July 2017 at 09:10, Greg Rose wrote:
> When there is an established connection in direction A->B, it is
> possible to receive a packet on port B which then executes
> ct(commit,force) without first performing ct() - ie, a lookup.
> In this case, we would expect that this packet can delete th
On 14 July 2017 at 09:10, Greg Rose wrote:
> When there is an established connection in direction A->B, it is
> possible to receive a packet on port B which then executes
> ct(commit,force) without first performing ct() - ie, a lookup.
> In this case, we would expect that this packet can delete th
When there is an established connection in direction A->B, it is
possible to receive a packet on port B which then executes
ct(commit,force) without first performing ct() - ie, a lookup.
In this case, we would expect that this packet can delete the existing
entry so that we can commit a connection
