On 22.09.2018 18:44, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 01:32:55AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Actually there's nothing wrong with the two changes, they just
>> revealed a problem which has been existing before.
>
> Hi Heiner
>
> This is missing a bit of context. Which two changes?
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 01:32:55AM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Actually there's nothing wrong with the two changes, they just
> revealed a problem which has been existing before.
Hi Heiner
This is missing a bit of context. Which two changes? I assume you mean
the two Fixes:
>
> Core of the
Actually there's nothing wrong with the two changes, they just
revealed a problem which has been existing before.
Core of the problem is that phy_suspend() suspends the PHY when it
should not because of WoL. phy_suspend() checks for WoL already, but
this works only if the PHY driver handles WoL (w