On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 18:26:17 +0200 Davide Caratti wrote:
> using packetdrill it's possible to observe the same MPTCP DSN being acked
> by different subflows with DACK4 and DACK8. This is in contrast with what
> specified in RFC8684 §3.3.2: if an MPTCP endpoint transmits a 64-bit wide
> DSN, it MUST
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, Davide Caratti wrote:
using packetdrill it's possible to observe the same MPTCP DSN being acked
by different subflows with DACK4 and DACK8. This is in contrast with what
specified in RFC8684 §3.3.2: if an MPTCP endpoint transmits a 64-bit wide
DSN, it MUST be acknowledged wit
using packetdrill it's possible to observe the same MPTCP DSN being acked
by different subflows with DACK4 and DACK8. This is in contrast with what
specified in RFC8684 §3.3.2: if an MPTCP endpoint transmits a 64-bit wide
DSN, it MUST be acknowledged with a 64-bit wide DACK. Fix 'use_64bit_ack'
var
