On 10/12/20 11:56 PM, Vasily Averin wrote:
Dear Yonghong Song,
thank you for reporting the problem.
As far as I understand the problem here is that pos is incremented in .start
function.
Yes.
I do not,like an idea to avoid increment in ipv6_route_seq_next()
however ipv6_route_seq_start c
Dear Yonghong Song,
thank you for reporting the problem.
As far as I understand the problem here is that pos is incremented in .start
function.
I do not,like an idea to avoid increment in ipv6_route_seq_next()
however ipv6_route_seq_start can provide fake argument instead.
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fi
Commit 4fc427e05158 ("ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index")
tried to fix the issue where seq_file pos is not increased
if a NULL element is returned with seq_ops->next(). See bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
The commit effectively does:
- increase pos for al
