On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:20:14PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 07:17 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:49:10PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 04/04/2018 04:56 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> The Marvell switches under some conditions will pass a frame to
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 01:56:44 +0200
> The Marvell switches under some conditions will pass a frame to the
> host with the port being the CPU port. Such frames are invalid, and
> should be dropped. Not dropping them can result in a crash when
> incrementing the receive statisti
On 04/04/2018 07:17 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:49:10PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 04/04/2018 04:56 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> The Marvell switches under some conditions will pass a frame to the
>>> host with the port being the CPU port. Such frames are invalid, an
On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:49:10PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 04:56 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > The Marvell switches under some conditions will pass a frame to the
> > host with the port being the CPU port. Such frames are invalid, and
> > should be dropped. Not dropping them can
On 04/04/2018 04:56 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> The Marvell switches under some conditions will pass a frame to the
> host with the port being the CPU port. Such frames are invalid, and
> should be dropped. Not dropping them can result in a crash when
> incrementing the receive statistics for an inval
The Marvell switches under some conditions will pass a frame to the
host with the port being the CPU port. Such frames are invalid, and
should be dropped. Not dropping them can result in a crash when
incrementing the receive statistics for an invalid port.
Reported-by: Chris Healy
Fixes: 5f6b4e14
