From: Paolo Abeni
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:01:06 +0200
> Currently data fin on data packet are not handled properly:
> the 'rcv_data_fin_seq' field is interpreted as the last
> sequence number carrying a valid data, but for data fin
> packet with valid maps we currently store map_seq + map_len,
Currently data fin on data packet are not handled properly:
the 'rcv_data_fin_seq' field is interpreted as the last
sequence number carrying a valid data, but for data fin
packet with valid maps we currently store map_seq + map_len,
that is, the next value.
The 'write_seq' fields carries instead t