From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:02:08 -0500
>
> As originally written rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev makes no sense when
> called with dev == NULL as it attempts to flush all uncached routes
> regardless of network namespace when dev == NULL. Which is simpl
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:02:08AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> As originally written rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev makes no sense when
> called with dev == NULL as it attempts to flush all uncached routes
> regardless of network namespace when dev == NULL. Which is simply
> incorrect behavio
As originally written rt6_uncached_list_flush_dev makes no sense when
called with dev == NULL as it attempts to flush all uncached routes
regardless of network namespace when dev == NULL. Which is simply
incorrect behavior.
Furthermore at the point rt6_ifdown is called with dev == NULL no more
n
