From: Ido Schimmel
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:49:13 +0200
> How about I'll send v2 with a comment and then we can try Alex's
> suggestion in net-next?
Sounds good.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:34:16AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> That seems like unneeded complexity when the issue is just the order
> that these were created in versus the order they are freed in. As long
> as we always destroy the one containing the alias before the one that
> has the actual d
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:32 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:13:20 +0200
>
>> Since commit 0ddcf43d5d4a ("ipv4: FIB Local/MAIN table collapse") the
>> local table uses the same trie allocated for the main table when custom
>> rules are not in use.
>>
>> Wh
From: Ido Schimmel
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:13:20 +0200
> Since commit 0ddcf43d5d4a ("ipv4: FIB Local/MAIN table collapse") the
> local table uses the same trie allocated for the main table when custom
> rules are not in use.
>
> When a net namespace is dismantled, the main table is flushed and
Since commit 0ddcf43d5d4a ("ipv4: FIB Local/MAIN table collapse") the
local table uses the same trie allocated for the main table when custom
rules are not in use.
When a net namespace is dismantled, the main table is flushed and freed
(via an RCU callback) before the local table. In case the call
