From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:31:25 +0300
> Static checkers complain that id_tbl->table points to longs and 4 bytes
> is smaller than sizeof(long). But the since other side is dividing by
> 32 instead of sizeof(long), that means the current code works fine.
>
> Anyway, it's more
Static checkers complain that id_tbl->table points to longs and 4 bytes
is smaller than sizeof(long). But the since other side is dividing by
32 instead of sizeof(long), that means the current code works fine.
Anyway, it's more conventional to use the BITS_TO_LONGS() macro when
we're allocating a
