On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:59:56AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Please provide a Fixes: tag for such a scary patch.
Done in v2.
Thanks,
Boris.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:20:13PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> Firstly, please add a Fixes: tag; I expect the relevant commit will be
> 88eb1944e18c ("net: core: propagate SKB lists through packet_type lookup")
> but I'm not 100% sure so do check that yourself.
You are right, this is the right c
On 18/05/2020 10:01, Boris Sukholitko wrote:
> __netif_receive_skb_core may change the skb pointer passed into it (e.g.
> in rx_handler). The original skb may be freed as a result of this
> operation.
>
> The callers of __netif_receive_skb_core may further process original skb
> by using pt_prev po
On 5/18/20 2:01 AM, Boris Sukholitko wrote:
> __netif_receive_skb_core may change the skb pointer passed into it (e.g.
> in rx_handler). The original skb may be freed as a result of this
> operation.
>
> The callers of __netif_receive_skb_core may further process original skb
> by using pt_prev
__netif_receive_skb_core may change the skb pointer passed into it (e.g.
in rx_handler). The original skb may be freed as a result of this
operation.
The callers of __netif_receive_skb_core may further process original skb
by using pt_prev pointer returned by __netif_receive_skb_core thus
leading
