Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 09/16] net/mlx5: Expose IP-in-IP TX and RX capability bits

2020-11-23 Thread Saeed Mahameed
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 17:17 +0200, Aya Levin wrote: > > On 11/22/2020 1:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:03:32 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > > From: Aya Levin > > > > > > Expose FW indication that it supports stateless offloads for IP > > > over IP > > > tunneled packets

Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 09/16] net/mlx5: Expose IP-in-IP TX and RX capability bits

2020-11-22 Thread Aya Levin
On 11/22/2020 1:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:03:32 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote: From: Aya Levin Expose FW indication that it supports stateless offloads for IP over IP tunneled packets per direction. In some HW like ConnectX-4 IP-in-IP support is not symmetric, it supp

Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 09/16] net/mlx5: Expose IP-in-IP TX and RX capability bits

2020-11-21 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:03:32 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > From: Aya Levin > > Expose FW indication that it supports stateless offloads for IP over IP > tunneled packets per direction. In some HW like ConnectX-4 IP-in-IP > support is not symmetric, it supports steering on the inner header but > i

[PATCH mlx5-next 09/16] net/mlx5: Expose IP-in-IP TX and RX capability bits

2020-11-20 Thread Saeed Mahameed
From: Aya Levin Expose FW indication that it supports stateless offloads for IP over IP tunneled packets per direction. In some HW like ConnectX-4 IP-in-IP support is not symmetric, it supports steering on the inner header but it doesn't TX-Checksum and TSO. Add IP-in-IP capability per direction