On 2019/01/06 0:55, William Tu wrote:
...
>>> + /* put into rq */
>>> + skb = veth_xdp_rcv_one(rq, xdpf, &inner_xdp_xmit);
>>> + if (!skb) {
>>> + /* Peer side has XDP program attached */
>>> + if (inner_xdp_xmit & VETH_XDP
Hi Toshiaki,
Thanks a lot for the feedback.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 5:44 AM Toshiaki Makita
wrote:
>
> Hi, William. Nice work.
> I have some feedback and questions.
>
> > + while (peer_rq->xsk_umem && budget--) {
> > + unsigned int inner_xdp_xmit = 0;
> > + unsigned in
Hi, William. Nice work.
I have some feedback and questions.
On 18/12/27 (木) 5:27:49, William Tu wrote:
The patch adds support for AF_XDP async xmit. Users can use
AF_XDP on both sides of the veth and get better performance, with
the cost of ksoftirqd doing the xmit. The veth_xsk_async_xmit
sim
The patch adds support for AF_XDP async xmit. Users can use
AF_XDP on both sides of the veth and get better performance, with
the cost of ksoftirqd doing the xmit. The veth_xsk_async_xmit
simply kicks the napi function, veth_poll, to receive the packets
that are on the umem transmit ring at the _
