Andrii Nakryiko writes:
>> BTW, I've noticed that you tend to drop Ccs on later versions of your
>> patch series (had to go and lookup v2 of this to check that it was in
>> fact merged). Is that intentional? :)
>
> Hm.. not sure about whether I tend to do that. But in this it was
> intentional an
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 8:01 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> Andrii Nakryiko writes:
>
> > This patch set adds new BPF link operation, LINK_DETACH, allowing processes
> > with BPF link FD to force-detach it from respective BPF hook, similarly how
> > BPF link is auto-detached when such BPF h
Andrii Nakryiko writes:
> This patch set adds new BPF link operation, LINK_DETACH, allowing processes
> with BPF link FD to force-detach it from respective BPF hook, similarly how
> BPF link is auto-detached when such BPF hook (e.g., cgroup, net_device, netns,
> etc) is removed. This facility all
This patch set adds new BPF link operation, LINK_DETACH, allowing processes
with BPF link FD to force-detach it from respective BPF hook, similarly how
BPF link is auto-detached when such BPF hook (e.g., cgroup, net_device, netns,
etc) is removed. This facility allows admin to forcefully undo BPF l
