On 12/19/2018 01:09 PM, bjorn.to...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel
>
> Prior this commit, when the struct socket object was being released,
> the UMEM did not have its reference count decreased. Instead, this was
> done in the struct sock sk_destruct function.
>
> There is no reason to kee
From: Björn Töpel
Prior this commit, when the struct socket object was being released,
the UMEM did not have its reference count decreased. Instead, this was
done in the struct sock sk_destruct function.
There is no reason to keep the UMEM reference around when the socket
is being orphaned, so i
