On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 12:56 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> On 04/11/2019 10:03 AM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> > The test meant to use the saved value of errno. Given the current code, it
> > makes no practical difference however.
> >
> > Fixes: bf598a8f0f77 ("bpftool: Improve handling of ENOENT on
On 04/11/2019 10:03 AM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> The test meant to use the saved value of errno. Given the current code, it
> makes no practical difference however.
>
> Fixes: bf598a8f0f77 ("bpftool: Improve handling of ENOENT on map dumps")
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier
Applied, thanks!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 4:23 AM Quentin Monnet
wrote:
>
> 2019-04-11 17:03 UTC+0900 ~ Benjamin Poirier
> > The test meant to use the saved value of errno. Given the current code, it
> > makes no practical difference however.
> >
> > Fixes: bf598a8f0f77 ("bpftool: Improve handling of ENOENT on map
2019-04-11 17:03 UTC+0900 ~ Benjamin Poirier
> The test meant to use the saved value of errno. Given the current code, it
> makes no practical difference however.
>
> Fixes: bf598a8f0f77 ("bpftool: Improve handling of ENOENT on map dumps")
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier
> ---
> tools/bpf/bpf
The test meant to use the saved value of errno. Given the current code, it
makes no practical difference however.
Fixes: bf598a8f0f77 ("bpftool: Improve handling of ENOENT on map dumps")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletio
