On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 03:30 PM CET, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/05/2019 03:12 PM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> [...]
>> Could you please queue it for -stable which has d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix
>> sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths")?
>
> Already done here yesterday
On 03/05/2019 03:12 PM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
[...]
> Could you please queue it for -stable which has d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix
> sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths")?
Already done here yesterday morning:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/40b25ec1c31e234cf7eee75d62083
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 10:05 PM CET, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
> timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results
> were reasonable when loaded as privileged:
>
> [...]
> uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
>
Hello!
On 02.03.2019 0:05, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results
Were?
were reasonable when loaded as privileged:
[...]
uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
u
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 10:05:29PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
> timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results
> were reasonable when loaded as privileged:
>
> [...]
> uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns()
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:23 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2019 12:18 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:06 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> >>
> >> Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
> >> timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while r
On 03/02/2019 12:18 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:06 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>
>> Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
>> timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results
>> were reasonable when loaded as privileged:
>>
>> [...
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:06 PM Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
> timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results
> were reasonable when loaded as privileged:
>
> [...]
> uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
> u
Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that
timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results
were reasonable when loaded as privileged:
[...]
uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
uint64_t b = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
uint64_t delta = b - a;
if ((i