Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 0/5] net: implement SMC-R solution

2015-07-31 Thread Ursula Braun
On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 16:15 -0700, David Miller wrote: > I'm really sorry but this is the same rabbit hole and set of claims > that have been bullhorned my way for RDMA over the years and I still > don't buy it. > > None of the RDMA'ish proponents ever talk about what you _don't_ get > when this

Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 0/5] net: implement SMC-R solution

2015-07-26 Thread David Miller
From: Ursula Braun Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:59:47 +0200 > 1. Provides optimized performance compared to standard TCP/IP over Ethernet >within the data center for both request/response (latency) and streaming >workloads (CPU savings) [3]. >Initial benchmarks on Linux on x86 processor

[PATCH V3 net-next 0/5] net: implement SMC-R solution

2015-07-22 Thread Ursula Braun
From: Ursula Braun Dave, this is V3 of my SMC-R patches, containing mainly a new version of the required tcp changes. Dave, you requested the new feature to be nearly zero cost. Thus my approach is a technique using Static Keys. Do you basicly agree with such an approach? For now I kept the CON