On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:31:53PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:46:52AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > By this I think you are aiming squarely at "[PATCH net-next v3 0/9] net:
>
> The best you came with is that phylink gives you flexibility and
> options, and sure it does, when you add a lot of stuff to it to make it
> do that. But I don't want to know why phylink is an option, I want to
> know why phylib isn't. Phylink is your creation, which as far as I'm
> concerned ste
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:46:52AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > By this I think you are aiming squarely at "[PATCH net-next v3 0/9] net:
> > ethernet backplane support on DPAA1". If I understand you correctly, yo
I'm sorry Vladimir, I can't cope with these replies that take hours to
write to your emails; it just takes up way too much time and interferes
way too much, I'm going to have to go back to the short sharp replies
out of necessity or just not reply.
Sorry.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:21:00PM +0100,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:46:52AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:18:32PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > I'd actually given up pushing this further; I've seen patches go by that
> > purpetuate the idea that the PCS is handled by phylib. I feel like
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:22:08PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 7/14/2020 6:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:49:58AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >> Are you going to post a non-RFC version?
> >
> > I'm waiting for the remaining patches to
I'll preface my reply by stating that this is my opinion and that it is
not representative of what you might be visualizing as "NXP".
It's not that I am trying to evade responsibility by saying this, but
rather that backplane Ethernet is simply not my responsibility, in fact
I have no saying at all
On 7/14/2020 6:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:49:58AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>> Are you going to post a non-RFC version?
>
> I'm waiting for the remaining patches to be reviewed; Florian reviewed
> the first six patches (which are not the import
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:49:58AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Are you going to post a non-RFC version?
I'm waiting for the remaining patches to be reviewed; Florian reviewed
the first six patches (which are not the important ones in the series)
and that seems to be where things have stopped.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 03:27:54PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This series updates the rudimentary phylink PCS support with the
> results of the last four months of development of that. Phylink
> PCS support was initially added back at the end of March, when it
> became
Hi,
This series updates the rudimentary phylink PCS support with the
results of the last four months of development of that. Phylink
PCS support was initially added back at the end of March, when it
became clear that the current approach of treating everything at
the MAC end as being part of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
