On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 13:04 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> PS FWIW, if I shift from using just the linux native vxlan to a "mostly
> full" set of OpenStack compute node plumbing - two OVS bridges and a
> linux bridge and associated plumbing with a vxlan tunnel defined in OVS,
> but nothing above t
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
> PS FWIW, if I shift from using just the linux native vxlan to a "mostly
> full" set of OpenStack compute node plumbing - two OVS bridges and a linux
> bridge and associated plumbing with a vxlan tunnel defined in OVS, but
> nothing above the Li
I went ahead and put the patched kernel on both systems. I was getting
mixed results - in one direction, results in the 8Gbit/s range, in the
other in the 7 Gbit/s. I noticed that interrupts were going to
different CPUs so I started playing with IRQ assignments, and bound all
interrupts of th
On 06/28/2015 10:20 AM, Ramu Ramamurthy wrote:
Rick, in your test, are you seeing gro becoming effective on the
vxlan interface with the 82599ES nic ? (ie, tcpdump on the vxlan
interface shows larger frames than the mtu of that interface, and
kernel trace shows vxlan_gro_receive() being hit)
Thr
On 06/28/2015 02:31 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
You're comparing apples to oranges. Please test the patch in your
environment I posted and report results. Please also test with
multiple connections, single connection performance can be misleading
and does not really reflect what real production server
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Ramu Ramamurthy
wrote:
> On 2015-06-26 17:46, Rick Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 06/26/2015 04:09 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>>
>>> Add calls to gro_cells infrastructure to do GRO when receiving on a
>>> tunnel.
>>>
>>> Testing:
>>>
>>> Ran 200 netperf TCP_STREAM instance
>>
On 2015-06-26 17:46, Rick Jones wrote:
On 06/26/2015 04:09 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
Add calls to gro_cells infrastructure to do GRO when receiving on a
tunnel.
Testing:
Ran 200 netperf TCP_STREAM instance
- With fix (GRO enabled on VXLAN interface)
Verify GRO is happening.
9084 MBps tp
On 06/26/2015 04:09 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
Add calls to gro_cells infrastructure to do GRO when receiving on a tunnel.
Testing:
Ran 200 netperf TCP_STREAM instance
- With fix (GRO enabled on VXLAN interface)
Verify GRO is happening.
9084 MBps tput
3.44% CPU utilization
- Without fi
Add calls to gro_cells infrastructure to do GRO when receiving on a tunnel.
Testing:
Ran 200 netperf TCP_STREAM instance
- With fix (GRO enabled on VXLAN interface)
Verify GRO is happening.
9084 MBps tput
3.44% CPU utilization
- Without fix (GRO disabled on VXLAN interface)
Verified
