On 31/07/15 13:44, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Westphal
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:24:03 +0200
>
>> Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 64-bits hosts, napi_gro_cb is 48 bytes, which is exactly the size of
>>> skb->cb[], while on 32-bits hosts it is 36 bytes, but if it were to
>>> grow, we wo
From: Florian Westphal
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 22:24:03 +0200
> Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 64-bits hosts, napi_gro_cb is 48 bytes, which is exactly the size of
>> skb->cb[], while on 32-bits hosts it is 36 bytes, but if it were to
>> grow, we would not be catching a size inflation as we should
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 64-bits hosts, napi_gro_cb is 48 bytes, which is exactly the size of
> skb->cb[], while on 32-bits hosts it is 36 bytes, but if it were to
> grow, we would not be catching a size inflation as we should.
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 64-bits hosts, napi_gro_cb is 48 bytes, which is exactly the size of
> skb->cb[], while on 32-bits hosts it is 36 bytes, but if it were to
> grow, we would not be catching a size inflation as we should.
>
> Make sure that we have enoug
On 64-bits hosts, napi_gro_cb is 48 bytes, which is exactly the size of
skb->cb[], while on 32-bits hosts it is 36 bytes, but if it were to
grow, we would not be catching a size inflation as we should.
Make sure that we have enough room for a napi_gro_cb to be hosted in
skb->cb[], and put this bui
