On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:21:25 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:38:43 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> >> Running with CONFIG_PREEMPT set, I get a
>> >>
>> >> BUG: using
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:21:25 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:38:43 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> >> Running with CONFIG_PREEMPT set, I get a
> >>
> >> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: tc/3793
>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:38:43 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Running with CONFIG_PREEMPT set, I get a
>>
>> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: tc/3793
>>
>> asserion from the TC action (mirred) stats_update callback, w
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:38:43 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Running with CONFIG_PREEMPT set, I get a
>
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: tc/3793
>
> asserion from the TC action (mirred) stats_update callback, when the do
>
> _bstats_cpu_update(this_cpu_ptr(a->cpu_
Running with CONFIG_PREEMPT set, I get a
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: tc/3793
asserion from the TC action (mirred) stats_update callback, when the do
_bstats_cpu_update(this_cpu_ptr(a->cpu_bstats), bytes, packets)
As done by commit 66860be "nfp: bpf: all