> I am not really questioning whether the abstraction is working, this
> clearly does, what I am wondering is if the use of the component
> framework requires us to have master and slaves be implemented as strict
> platform devices, or if we have a choice in how we mix things together,
> like maste
Le 25/12/2015 03:31, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
>>> One of my aims is to abstract away the MDIO bus from DSA. How you talk
>>> to the switch is a switch device property. SF2 has a different way to
>>> talk to the switch, memory mapped IO, etc.
>>
>> I appreciate you trying to see my point of view and me
> > One of my aims is to abstract away the MDIO bus from DSA. How you talk
> > to the switch is a switch device property. SF2 has a different way to
> > talk to the switch, memory mapped IO, etc.
>
> I appreciate you trying to see my point of view and mentioning the
> driver that I care about, but
Le 24/12/2015 04:58, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
>> I do not think you need the platform device because ultimately what the
>> DSA platform device does is bind some data to the master network device
>> the DSA switch tree is hanging off. Sure you need some piece of code
>> that is resident in kernel or m
> I do not think you need the platform device because ultimately what the
> DSA platform device does is bind some data to the master network device
> the DSA switch tree is hanging off. Sure you need some piece of code
> that is resident in kernel or module space to be able to parse and
> allocate
Le 23/12/2015 14:33, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:44:59PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Le 23/12/2015 04:56, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
>>> As noted in Documentation/networking/dsa/dsa.txt, the current DSA
>>> architecture has a few architecture problems:
>>>
>
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:44:59PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Le 23/12/2015 04:56, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
> > As noted in Documentation/networking/dsa/dsa.txt, the current DSA
> > architecture has a few architecture problems:
> >
> > DSA is implemented as a DSA platform device
Hi Andrew,
Le 23/12/2015 04:56, Andrew Lunn a écrit :
> As noted in Documentation/networking/dsa/dsa.txt, the current DSA
> architecture has a few architecture problems:
>
> DSA is implemented as a DSA platform device driver which is convenient because
> it will register the entire DSA switch tre
As noted in Documentation/networking/dsa/dsa.txt, the current DSA
architecture has a few architecture problems:
DSA is implemented as a DSA platform device driver which is convenient because
it will register the entire DSA switch tree attached to a master network device
in one-shot, facilitating t
