On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2007 20:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:43:10AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > When passing an file name > 1k the stack could be overflowed.
> > > Not really a security issue, but still better
On Monday 10 December 2007 20:32, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:43:10AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > When passing an file name > 1k the stack could be overflowed.
> > Not really a security issue, but still better plugged.
>
> Looks good. A s-o-b line again please.
Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:43:10AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> When passing an file name > 1k the stack could be overflowed.
> Not really a security issue, but still better plugged.
Looks good. A s-o-b line again please.
Although I am not so happy with the ue of gcc extensions.
Sam
>
>
When passing an file name > 1k the stack could be overflowed.
Not really a security issue, but still better plugged.
---
scripts/mod/modpost.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/scripts/mod/modpost.c
=
