On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 21:35 -0800, Simon Barber wrote:
> This is all part of the client MLME - it would be much better to add
> this functionality to wpa_supplicant, rather than adding it to the
> kernel. Nothing here needs to be in the kernel for any reason.
Theoretically, the whole network stack
out and made a kernel
option - off by default.
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zhu Yi
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:03 PM
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] d80211: add sysfs interface for QoS functions
The
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:23 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> So... what about implementing that into cfg80211? :-)
>
> I'm not inclined towards this patch (even if you address Stephen's
> comment).
OK. This is only for my testing (or maybe someone else wants to try the
code). I'm not asking to merge it
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:23 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:03:02 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> > The sysfs interface here is only a proof of concept. It provides a way for
> > the userspace applications to use the advanced QoS features supported by
> > d80211 stack. The finial solution s
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:03:02 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
> The sysfs interface here is only a proof of concept. It provides a way for
> the userspace applications to use the advanced QoS features supported by
> d80211 stack. The finial solution should be switched to cfg80211.
So... what about implementin
O
> +static ssize_t store_tspec(struct class_device *dev, const char *buf,
> +size_t len)
> +{
> + if (sscanf(buf, "%hu %hu %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %u %hu %hu",
> +&_tspec.nominal_msdu_size,
> +&_tspec.max_msdu_size,
> +
The sysfs interface here is only a proof of concept. It provides a way for
the userspace applications to use the advanced QoS features supported by
d80211 stack. The finial solution should be switched to cfg80211.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/d80211/ieee80211_i.h | 13
