From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 11:46:20 -0400
> Hello, David.
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 07:23:22PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> Second question, is there an upper bound on this header size?
>> Because if there is, it seems to me that there is no reason why we
>> can't just avoid the f
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:36:02 -0700
> There's no such thing as CON_EXTENDED. Not sure what this is trying to
> say.
Please read the patch series that, in the title posting of this series,
Tejun explains this series depends upon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
On Mon, 11 May 2015 12:41:34 -0400 Tejun Heo wrote:
> printk logbuf keeps various metadata and optional key=value dictionary
> for structured messages, both of which are stripped when messages are
> handed to regular console drivers.
>
> It can be useful to have this metadata and dictionary avai
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:37:45 -0400
> The current code does produce the latter outcome.
>
> header = msg;
> body = memchr(msg, ';', msg_len);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!body))
> return;
>
> header_len = body - header;
> body_len = msg_len -
Hello,
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:23:39PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Tejun Heo
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:41:34 -0400
>
> > + /* need to insert extra header fields, detect header and body */
> > + header = msg;
> > + body = memchr(msg, ';', msg_len);
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!body
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:41:34 -0400
> + /* need to insert extra header fields, detect header and body */
> + header = msg;
> + body = memchr(msg, ';', msg_len);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!body))
> + return;
> +
> + header_len = body - header;
> + b
