On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:13:55PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:11:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >> > netconsole itself is optional &
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:11:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > netconsole itself is optional & modular. I'm not sure making further
> >> > splits is called for,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:49:14AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > netconsole itself is optional & modular. I'm not sure making further
> > > splits is called for, especially given the use cases.
> >
> > It could be a hidden opti
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > netconsole itself is optional & modular. I'm not sure making further
>> > splits is called for, especially given the use cases.
>>
>> It could be a hidden option, selected
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > netconsole itself is optional & modular. I'm not sure making further
> > splits is called for, especially given the use cases.
>
> It could be a hidden option, selected by its users (e.g. netconsole).
Hmmm... what do you mea
Hi Tejun,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:20:41AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
>>
>> > @@ -2196,6 +2227,7 @@ out:
>> > */
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:20:41AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
>
> > @@ -2196,6 +2227,7 @@ out:
> > */
> > void console_unlock(void)
> > {
> > + static char
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -2196,6 +2227,7 @@ out:
> */
> void console_unlock(void)
> {
> + static char ext_text[CONSOLE_EXT_LOG_MAX];
Can you please
a) make this feature optional,
