Arnd Bergmann writes:
> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:49:58 AM CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>>
>> > A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the
>> > 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is
>> > rather complex already, thi
On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 9:49:58 AM CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
> > A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the
> > 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is
> > rather complex already, this confuses the compiler to the
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the
> 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is
> rather complex already, this confuses the compiler to the point where
> it can no longer figure out if the variable is always initial
A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the
'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is
rather complex already, this confuses the compiler to the point where
it can no longer figure out if the variable is always initialized
correctly:
brcm80211/brcmf
