Corey Hickey wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>> -static int
>>> -sfq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc* sch)
>>> +static void sfq_q_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sfq_sched_data
>>> *q, unsigned int end)
>>
>>
>>
>> Please make sure to break at 80 chars and to keep the style
>> in
Patrick McHardy wrote:
-static int
-sfq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc* sch)
+static void sfq_q_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sfq_sched_data *q,
unsigned int end)
Please make sure to break at 80 chars and to keep the style
in this file consistent (newline before function name
Corey Hickey wrote:
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
> index 9579573..8ae077f 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@
> #define SFQ_DEPTH128
> #define SFQ_HASH_DIVISOR 1024
>
> +#define SFQ_HEAD 0
> +#define SFQ_
Make a new function sfq_q_enqueue() that operates directly on the
queue data. This will be useful for implementing sfq_change() in
a later patch. A pleasant side-effect is reducing most of the
duplicate code in sfq_enqueue() and sfq_requeue().
Similarly, make a new function sfq_q_dequeue().
Signe
Make a new function sfq_q_enqueue() that operates directly on the
queue data. This will be useful for implementing sfq_change() in
a later patch. A pleasant side-effect is reducing most of the
duplicate code in sfq_enqueue() and sfq_requeue().
Similarly, make a new function sfq_q_dequeue().
Signe
