Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add devlink support

2020-12-03 Thread Grygorii Strashko
On 03/12/2020 16:18, Andrew Lunn wrote: We don't want to enable HW based switch support unless explicitly asked by user. This is the key point. Why? Does individual ports when passed through the switch not work properly? Does it add extra latency/jitter? When switch mode is enabled the for

Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add devlink support

2020-12-03 Thread Andrew Lunn
> We don't want to enable HW based switch support unless explicitly > asked by user. This is the key point. Why? Does individual ports when passed through the switch not work properly? Does it add extra latency/jitter? Please justify this. Andrew

Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add devlink support

2020-12-03 Thread Vignesh Raghavendra
Hi Andrew, On 11/30/20 9:20 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:50:43PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >> AM65 NUSS ethernet switch on K3 devices can be configured to work either >> in independent mac mode where each port acts as independent network >> interface (multi mac) or s

Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add devlink support

2020-11-30 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:50:43PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > AM65 NUSS ethernet switch on K3 devices can be configured to work either > in independent mac mode where each port acts as independent network > interface (multi mac) or switch mode. > > Add devlink hooks to provide a way to sw

[PATCH 1/4] net: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Add devlink support

2020-11-30 Thread Vignesh Raghavendra
AM65 NUSS ethernet switch on K3 devices can be configured to work either in independent mac mode where each port acts as independent network interface (multi mac) or switch mode. Add devlink hooks to provide a way to switch b/w these modes. Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra --- .../devlink/am6