Hi David,
On 2017/01/16 01:38PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> I'm assuming these patches will go via the powerpc tree.
>
> If you want them to go into net-next, I kindly ask that you always
> explicitly say so, and furthermore always submit a patch series with
> a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header post
I'm assuming these patches will go via the powerpc tree.
If you want them to go into net-next, I kindly ask that you always
explicitly say so, and furthermore always submit a patch series with
a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:40:00PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann
>
> We have a check earlier to ensure we don't proceed if image is NULL. As
> such, the redundant check can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann
> [Added similar changes for classic BPF JIT]
> Signe
From: Daniel Borkmann
We have a check earlier to ensure we don't proceed if image is NULL. As
such, the redundant check can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann
[Added similar changes for classic BPF JIT]
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 17 +-
