Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB

2006-07-26 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 03:44:15PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > skbuff.h has an #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB to allow > > architectures to reimplement __dev_alloc_skb. It's not set on any > > architecture and now that we have an architecture-overrideable > > NET_SKB_PAD there is not p

Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB

2006-07-24 Thread Roland Dreier
> skbuff.h has an #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB to allow > architectures to reimplement __dev_alloc_skb. It's not set on any > architecture and now that we have an architecture-overrideable > NET_SKB_PAD there is not point at all to have one either. I missed this when hch first posted it

Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB

2006-07-24 Thread David Miller
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 11:10:08 +0200 > skbuff.h has an #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB to allow > architectures to reimplement __dev_alloc_skb. It's not set on any > architecture and now that we have an architecture-overrideable > NET_SKB_PAD the

[PATCH 1/2] remove CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB

2006-07-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
skbuff.h has an #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_DEV_ALLOC_SKB to allow architectures to reimplement __dev_alloc_skb. It's not set on any architecture and now that we have an architecture-overrideable NET_SKB_PAD there is not point at all to have one either. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROT