On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:33:28PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Looks like I incorrectly merged one of the rtnl lock changes,
> so that one function, bonding_show_active_slave, held rtnl but didn't
> release it, and another, bonding_store_active_slave, never held rtnl but
> did release it.
>
Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Looks like I incorrectly merged one of the rtnl lock changes,
> so that one function, bonding_show_active_slave, held rtnl but didn't
> release it, and another, bonding_store_active_slave, never held rtnl but
> did release it.
>
> Fixed so the first function doesn
Looks like I incorrectly merged one of the rtnl lock changes,
so that one function, bonding_show_active_slave, held rtnl but didn't
release it, and another, bonding_store_active_slave, never held rtnl but
did release it.
Fixed so the first function doesn't mess with rtnl, and the
s
