Re: [PATCH 1/1] Reverse sense of promisc tests in ip6_mc_input

2007-05-14 Thread David Miller
From: David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:21:10 -0700 > Your patch looks correct to me. > > +-DLS > > Signed-off-by: David L Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch applied, thanks Corey and David for reviewing. I'll push this to -stable too. - To unsu

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Reverse sense of promisc tests in ip6_mc_input

2007-05-12 Thread David Stevens
Your patch looks correct to me. +-DLS Signed-off-by: David L Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/12/2007 03:51:35 PM: > From: Corey Mutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reverse the sense of the promiscuous-mode tests in ip6_mc_input(). > > Signed-off-b

[PATCH 1/1] Reverse sense of promisc tests in ip6_mc_input

2007-05-12 Thread Corey Mutter
From: Corey Mutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reverse the sense of the promiscuous-mode tests in ip6_mc_input(). Signed-off-by: Corey Mutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- I had been suspicious of this code for a while, but just assumed I must have been missing something. However, I did some tests and, sur