Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:55:47 +0400
> "Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
>> > simple network de
no, and this is important. Loopback is initialized in fs_initcall which
is called sufficiently before module_init.
I have checked the code and do not see initialization order mistakes
right now. But, from now on, maintainer should pay attention for this
unfortunate consequence :(
Regards,
Den
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:55:47 +0400
"Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
> > simple network device, and it removes the special case
> > single static a
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
simple network device, and it removes the special case
single static allocation of a struct net_device, hopefully
making maintenance easier.
Appli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
> simple network device, and it removes the special case
> single static allocation of a struct net_device, hopefully
> making maintenance easier.
>
> Applies agains
From: Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
simple network device, and it removes the special case
single static allocation of a struct net_device, hopefully
making maintenance easier.
Applies against net-2.6.24
Tested on i386, x86_64
Comp
