Re: [PATCH 1/1] Corrections to LSM-IPSec Nethooks

2006-01-06 Thread David S. Miller
From: Trent Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:09:43 -0500 > Signed-off-by: Trent Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks Trent. I think it's a small bit of lesser known trivia that I spent one semester at Penn State, on the Erie campus :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: se

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Corrections to LSM-IPSec Nethooks

2006-01-06 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 11:09 -0500, Trent Jaeger wrote: > Forgot signoff -- see below. > > On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Trent Jaeger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This patch contains two corrections to the LSM-IPsec Nethooks patches > > previously applied. > > > > (1) free a security context on a faile

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Corrections to LSM-IPSec Nethooks

2006-01-06 Thread Trent Jaeger
Forgot signoff -- see below. On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Trent Jaeger wrote: Hi, This patch contains two corrections to the LSM-IPsec Nethooks patches previously applied. (1) free a security context on a failed insert via xfrm_user interface in xfrm_add_policy. Memory leak. (2) change the

[PATCH 1/1] Corrections to LSM-IPSec Nethooks

2006-01-06 Thread Trent Jaeger
Hi, This patch contains two corrections to the LSM-IPsec Nethooks patches previously applied. (1) free a security context on a failed insert via xfrm_user interface in xfrm_add_policy. Memory leak. (2) change the authorization of the allocation of a security context in a xfrm_policy or xfrm_