Patrick McHardy wrote:
Corey Hickey wrote:
Move sfq_q_destroy() to above sfq_q_init() so that it can be used
by an error case in a later patch.
Move sfq_destroy() as well, for clarity.
This patch looks pointless, just put them where you need them
in the patch introducing them.
As you wish.
Corey Hickey wrote:
> Move sfq_q_destroy() to above sfq_q_init() so that it can be used
> by an error case in a later patch.
>
> Move sfq_destroy() as well, for clarity.
This patch looks pointless, just put them where you need them
in the patch introducing them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Move sfq_q_destroy() to above sfq_q_init() so that it can be used
by an error case in a later patch.
Move sfq_destroy() as well, for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Corey Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_sfq.c | 22 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Move sfq_q_destroy() to above sfq_q_init() so that it can be used
by an error case in a later patch.
Move sfq_destroy() as well, for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Corey Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/sched/sch_sfq.c | 22 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)