In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT)),
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> All applied, and I agree with pushing 1-3 into -stable,
> please send it.
Done. Thanks.
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:20:45 +0900 (JST)
> Following changesets fix several errors in extension header handling.
> I'd propose to push them (except 4/4, maybe) to -stable.
>
> [PATCH 1/4] [IPV6]: Ensure to have hop-by-hop options in our header of
>
Hello.
Following changesets fix several errors in extension header handling.
I'd propose to push them (except 4/4, maybe) to -stable.
[PATCH 1/4] [IPV6]: Ensure to have hop-by-hop options in our header of &sk_buff.
[PATCH 2/4] [IPV6] XFRM: Don't use old copy of pointer after pskb_may_pull().
[PAT
