From: NeilBrown
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 12:23:40 +1000
> I'm sorry if I've caused some confusion, but I didn't think that I was
> submitting patches to you and know nothing about your two trees.
> I was submitting patches to Thomas and Herbert, the registered
> maintainers of rhashtable. I as
On Fri, Mar 30 2018, David Miller wrote:
> From: NeilBrown
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:19:09 +1100
>
>> These two patches apply on top of my previous "rhashtable: reset iter
>> when rhashtable_walk_start sees new table" patch.
>>
>> The first fixes a bug that I found in rhltable_insert().
>>
>>
From: NeilBrown
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:19:09 +1100
> These two patches apply on top of my previous "rhashtable: reset iter
> when rhashtable_walk_start sees new table" patch.
>
> The first fixes a bug that I found in rhltable_insert().
>
> The second is an alternate to my "rhashtable: allow
These two patches apply on top of my previous "rhashtable: reset iter
when rhashtable_walk_start sees new table" patch.
The first fixes a bug that I found in rhltable_insert().
The second is an alternate to my "rhashtable: allow a walk of the hash
table without missing object."
This version doesn
