On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (mah...@bandewar.net):
>>> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>>>
>>> [Same as the previous RFC series sent on 9/21]
>>>
>>> TL;DR version
>>> --
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (mah...@bandewar.net):
>> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>>
>> [Same as the previous RFC series sent on 9/21]
>>
>> TL;DR version
>> -
>> Creating a sandbox environment with namespaces is challenging
>> consideri
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (mah...@bandewar.net):
> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>
> [Same as the previous RFC series sent on 9/21]
>
> TL;DR version
> -
> Creating a sandbox environment with namespaces is challenging
> considering what these sandboxed processes can engage into. e.g.
> CVE-201
From: Mahesh Bandewar
[Same as the previous RFC series sent on 9/21]
TL;DR version
-
Creating a sandbox environment with namespaces is challenging
considering what these sandboxed processes can engage into. e.g.
CVE-2017-6074, CVE-2017-7184, CVE-2017-7308 etc. just to name few.
Curre
From: Mahesh Bandewar
TL;DR version
-
Creating a sandbox environment with namespaces is challenging
considering what these sandboxed processes can engage into. e.g.
CVE-2017-6074, CVE-2017-7184, CVE-2017-7308 etc. just to name few.
Current form of user-namespaces, however, if changed
