Quoting Daniel Borkmann (2021-02-26 17:00:58)
> Applied, thanks!
You're welcome!
On 2/24/21 10:24 PM, Ian Denhardt wrote:
Gah, managed to typo my own name in the v2 patch >.<
This one should be good :/
Ian Denhardt (2):
tools, bpf_asm: Hard error on out of range jumps.
tools, bpf_asm: exit non-zero on errors.
tools/bpf/bpf_exp.y | 14 --
1 file changed
Gah, managed to typo my own name in the v2 patch >.<
This one should be good :/
Ian Denhardt (2):
tools, bpf_asm: Hard error on out of range jumps.
tools, bpf_asm: exit non-zero on errors.
tools/bpf/bpf_exp.y | 14 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.30.1
Second pass at the patches from:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ef747c45-a68c-2a87-202c-5fd9faf70...@iogearbox.net/T/#t.
Patches are the same, this just addes the Signed-off-by: lines
as requested by Daniel Borkmann
Ian Denhardt (2):
tools, bpf_asm: Hard error on out of range jumps.
tools, bpf_
Hi Ian,
On 2/24/21 3:36 AM, Ian Denhardt wrote:
Hi,
Enclosed are two patches related to my earlier message, which make the
error checking in the bpf_asm tool more strict, the first by upgrading a
warning to an error, the second by using non-zero exit codes when
aborting.
These could be concept
Hi,
Enclosed are two patches related to my earlier message, which make the
error checking in the bpf_asm tool more strict, the first by upgrading a
warning to an error, the second by using non-zero exit codes when
aborting.
These could be conceptually separated, but it seemed sensible to submit
t
