On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:21:23AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I applied this to the new "e100-sbit" branch of netdev-2.6.git, which
> will auto-propagate to Andrew's -mm tree.
>
> Let's see what testers think... eepro100 is growing mold, and I would
> love to get rid of it at this point.
>
>
Scott Feldman wrote:
I was going to say that eepro100's speedo_rx_link() does the same DMA
abuse as e100, but then I noticed one little detail: eepro100 sets both
EL (end of list) and S (suspend) bits in the RFD as it chains it to the
RFD list. e100 was only setting the EL bit. Hmmm, that'
On Nov 5, 2005, at 2:28 AM, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Scott Feldman wrote:
So there is nothing left. Why not just remove eepro100?
This has been coming up every few months for a while now. e100
doesn't
work on a number of ARM platforms due to
On 11/5/05, Lennert Buytenhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Scott Feldman wrote:
>
> > So there is nothing left. Why not just remove eepro100?
>
> This has been coming up every few months for a while now. e100 doesn't
> work on a number of ARM platforms du
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 11:28:21AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> This has been coming up every few months for a while now. e100 doesn't
> work on a number of ARM platforms due to its (ab)use of the DMA API.
>
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0406.3/1438.html
> http
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:34:05PM -0800, Scott Feldman wrote:
> So there is nothing left. Why not just remove eepro100?
This has been coming up every few months for a while now. e100 doesn't
work on a number of ARM platforms due to its (ab)use of the DMA API.
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hy
