On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing
>
> This is not a bug fix but an optimisation. The walker entries are
> all marked as dead and will be skipped by the loop.
>
> However, I don't see anything wrong with this optimisation.
>
> Cheers,
thanks, you a
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:53:34PM +0800, roy.qing...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Li RongQing
>
> If the walk from input is not empty, the following loop should start from
> the walk->next, since walk is list header, and the last policy in previours
> loop is connected walk tailor by list_move_tail(
From: Li RongQing
If the walk from input is not empty, the following loop should start from
the walk->next, since walk is list header, and the last policy in previours
loop is connected walk tailor by list_move_tail()
Fixes: 12a169e7d8f(ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list)
Cc: Herbert Xu
Signed
