From: Boris Ostrovsky
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:19:07 -0400
> On 10/16/2017 11:05 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:20:32PM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
>>> RFC791 specifies the minimum MTU to be 68, while xen-net{front|back}
>>> drivers use a minimum value of 0.
>>>
>>> When set M
On 10/16/2017 11:05 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:20:32PM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
>> RFC791 specifies the minimum MTU to be 68, while xen-net{front|back}
>> drivers use a minimum value of 0.
>>
>> When set MTU to 0~67 with xen_net{front|back} driver, the network
>> will becom
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:20:32PM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
> RFC791 specifies the minimum MTU to be 68, while xen-net{front|back}
> drivers use a minimum value of 0.
>
> When set MTU to 0~67 with xen_net{front|back} driver, the network
> will become unreachable immediately, the guest can no l
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 03:20:32PM +0200, Mohammed Gamal wrote:
> RFC791 specifies the minimum MTU to be 68, while xen-net{front|back}
> drivers use a minimum value of 0.
>
> When set MTU to 0~67 with xen_net{front|back} driver, the network
> will become unreachable immediately, the guest can no l
RFC791 specifies the minimum MTU to be 68, while xen-net{front|back}
drivers use a minimum value of 0.
When set MTU to 0~67 with xen_net{front|back} driver, the network
will become unreachable immediately, the guest can no longer be pinged.
xen_net{front|back} should not allow the user to set thi
