From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:59:33 +0200
> Do you plan to send another pull request to Linus, and can you take
> the patch, please?
Yes and yes.
Hi!
On Thu 2017-08-31 12:26:45, David Miller wrote:
> From: Pavel Machek
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 20:57:19 +0200
>
> > Hi!
> >
> >> From: Pavel Machek
> >> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:47:43 +0200
> >>
> >> > Dave, Linus -- can you still take the patch?
> >>
> >> Pavel, please do not bypass mai
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 20:57:19 +0200
> Hi!
>
>> From: Pavel Machek
>> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:47:43 +0200
>>
>> > Dave, Linus -- can you still take the patch?
>>
>> Pavel, please do not bypass maintainers like this.
>>
>> It's really rude, and if you do things like that
Hi!
> From: Pavel Machek
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:47:43 +0200
>
> > Dave, Linus -- can you still take the patch?
>
> Pavel, please do not bypass maintainers like this.
>
> It's really rude, and if you do things like that instead of
> trying to work properly with us, your relationship with
>
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 16:47:43 +0200
> Dave, Linus -- can you still take the patch?
Pavel, please do not bypass maintainers like this.
It's really rude, and if you do things like that instead of
trying to work properly with us, your relationship with
these maintainers will s
From: Cong Wang
wl1251: add a missing spin_lock_init()
This fixes the following kernel warning:
[ 5668.771453] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/u2:3/9745
[ 5668.771850] lock: 0xce63ef20, .magic: , .owner: /-1,
.owner_cpu: 0
[ 5668.772277] CPU: 0 PID: 9745 Comm: kwo
