Re: [PATCH] wan/sdla section fixes

2006-06-12 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
"Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > static const char* version = "SDLA driver v0.30, 12 Sep 1996, >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]"; >> >> 1996 doesn't look encouraging but it may be misleading. > > Yep. You could ignore it :) or rm drivers/net/wan/slda* :) I don't know, maybe Mike will say

Re: [PATCH] wan/sdla section fixes

2006-06-12 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:50:22 +0200 Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Hi, > > "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Priority: tossup. > > netdev->set_config can be called at any time, so these references > > to __initdata would be a real problem. > > However, problem has not been observed AFAI

Re: [PATCH] wan/sdla section fixes

2006-06-12 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Hi, "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Priority: tossup. > netdev->set_config can be called at any time, so these references > to __initdata would be a real problem. > However, problem has not been observed AFAIK. > > Fix section mismatch warnings: > WARNING: drivers/net/wan/sdla.o - Se

[PATCH] wan/sdla section fixes

2006-06-08 Thread Randy.Dunlap
From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Priority: tossup. netdev->set_config can be called at any time, so these references to __initdata would be a real problem. However, problem has not been observed AFAIK. Fix section mismatch warnings: WARNING: drivers/net/wan/sdla.o - Section mismatch: refere