On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 04:42:05PM +0800, Su Yanjun
wrote:
> On 1/4/2019 3:43 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 07:48:41AM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
> > > Recently we run a network test over ipcomp virtual tunnel.We find that
> > > if a ipv4 packet needs fragment, then the
On 1/4/2019 3:43 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 07:48:41AM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
Recently we run a network test over ipcomp virtual tunnel.We find that
if a ipv4 packet needs fragment, then the peer can't receive
it.
We deep into the code and find that when packet need f
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 07:48:41AM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
> Recently we run a network test over ipcomp virtual tunnel.We find that
> if a ipv4 packet needs fragment, then the peer can't receive
> it.
>
> We deep into the code and find that when packet need fragment the smaller
> fragment will be
Recently we run a network test over ipcomp virtual tunnel.We find that
if a ipv4 packet needs fragment, then the peer can't receive
it.
We deep into the code and find that when packet need fragment the smaller
fragment will be encapsulated by ipip not ipcomp. So when the ipip packet
goes into xfrm
