From: Al Viro
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 20:13:22 +0100
> we do have an RCU-delayed part there already (freeing the wq),
> so it's not like the pipe situation; moreover, it might be
> worth considering coallocating wq with the rest of struct sock_alloc.
> ->sk_wq in struct sock would remain a pointer
we do have an RCU-delayed part there already (freeing the wq),
so it's not like the pipe situation; moreover, it might be
worth considering coallocating wq with the rest of struct sock_alloc.
->sk_wq in struct sock would remain a pointer as it is, but
the object it normally points to would be coall
