From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:52:10 +
> I already have a stack of patches for phy, phylink and sfp that I
> need to send, including documentation patches which Florian has
> already found very useful and helpful. I had assumed that net-next
> was already closed, be
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:58:05PM +0900, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jan Kundrát
> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:39:33 +0100
>
> > Without this patch, but with CONFIG_SFP enabled, my NIC won't detect
> > module unplugging, which is suboptimal.
> >
> > I'm using an OEM "Cisco compatible" DWDM fixed-
From: Jan Kundrát
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:39:33 +0100
> Without this patch, but with CONFIG_SFP enabled, my NIC won't detect
> module unplugging, which is suboptimal.
>
> I'm using an OEM "Cisco compatible" DWDM fixed-frequency 100Ghz-grid SFP
> module. It reports itself as a 0x0b 0x24. Accord
Without this patch, but with CONFIG_SFP enabled, my NIC won't detect
module unplugging, which is suboptimal.
I'm using an OEM "Cisco compatible" DWDM fixed-frequency 100Ghz-grid SFP
module. It reports itself as a 0x0b 0x24. According to SFF-8024, byte 0
value "0Bh" refers to a "DWDM-SFP/SFP+ (not
